Nous avons détecté que vous utilisez un bloqueur de publicités (AdBlock) pendant votre
navigation
sur
notre site. Bien que nous comprenions les raisons qui peuvent vous pousser à utiliser ces
outils,
nous tenons à préciser que notre plateforme se finance principalement grâce à des
publicités.
Ces publicités, soigneusement sélectionnées, sont principalement axées sur la littérature et
l'art.
Elles ne sont pas intrusives et peuvent même vous offrir des opportunités intéressantes dans
ces
domaines. En bloquant ces publicités, vous limitez nos ressources et risquez de manquer des
offres
pertinentes.
Afin de pouvoir continuer à naviguer et profiter de nos contenus, nous vous demandons de bien
vouloir
désactiver votre bloqueur de publicités pour notre site. Cela nous permettra de continuer à
vous
fournir un contenu de qualité et vous de rester connecté aux dernières nouvelles et
tendances de
la
littérature et de l'art.
Pour continuer à accéder à notre contenu, veuillez désactiver votre bloqueur de publicités
et
cliquer sur le bouton ci-dessous pour recharger la page.
Nous vous remercions pour votre compréhension et votre soutien.
Cordialement,
L'équipe BookNode
P.S : Si vous souhaitez profiter d'une navigation sans publicité, nous vous proposons notre
option Premium. Avec cette offre, vous pourrez parcourir notre contenu de manière illimitée,
sans aucune publicité. Pour découvrir plus sur notre offre Premium et prendre un abonnement,
cliquez ici.
Immediately after the US-led invasion of Iraq, which was opposed by the Syrian government of Bashar al-Asad, there were real fears that Damascus would be next in line for 'regime change'. This perception was reinforced by Washington's rhetoric and its claims that the post-invasion Iraqi insurgency is being assisted by the Syrian intelligence service. The assassination of the Lebanese prime minister, Rafiq Hariri, compounded this pressure, with many observers pointing the finger at Damascus. The repercussions of his murder were anything but beneficial: Syria was compelled to withdrew its troops from Lebanon, where they had been stationed for nearly three decades. On the domestic front, Bashar is caught between hardliners and an increasingly impatient opposition. But will international pressure precipitate long overdue political reforms, or might it rebound, stifling the albeit hesitant relaxation of internal controls? Wieland argues that the West must not ignore Syria's robust tradition of secularism, and cautions that US attempts to undermine the current regime may, paradoxically, embolden the Islamists and help the regime to maintain its authoritarian grip on power.
Résumé
Immediately after the US-led invasion of Iraq, which was opposed by the Syrian government of Bashar al-Asad, there were real fears that Damascus would be next in line for 'regime change'. This perception was reinforced by Washington's rhetoric and its claims that the post-invasion Iraqi insurgency is being assisted by the Syrian intelligence service. The assassination of the Lebanese prime minister, Rafiq Hariri, compounded this pressure, with many observers pointing the finger at Damascus. The repercussions of his murder were anything but beneficial: Syria was compelled to withdrew its troops from Lebanon, where they had been stationed for nearly three decades. On the domestic front, Bashar is caught between hardliners and an increasingly impatient opposition. But will international pressure precipitate long overdue political reforms, or might it rebound, stifling the albeit hesitant relaxation of internal controls? Wieland argues that the West must not ignore Syria's robust tradition of secularism, and cautions that US attempts to undermine the current regime may, paradoxically, embolden the Islamists and help the regime to maintain its authoritarian grip on power.
Afficher en entier